Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

United responds to passengers’ lawsuit over windowless ‘window seats’ as lawyer bashes airlines ‘word games’

United argued Monday that labeling seats as ‘window’ only indicates their position next to the aircraft wall and does not guarantee an exterior view

Erin Keller
In Ohio
Tuesday 11 November 2025 12:21 EST
Comments
Flight cancellations and delays continue amid shutdown

United Airlines asked a federal judge Monday to dismiss a lawsuit alleging it charged passengers extra for “window seats” that did not actually have windows.

In August, passengers filed class-action lawsuits against United and Delta after some seats on Boeing 737, 757, and Airbus A321 planes labeled as “window” had no actual windows, a detail, they claim, was not disclosed during booking.

Attorney Carter Greenbaum, representing plaintiffs against United and Delta, told Reuters that United's position was "contrary to the reasonable expectations of countless passengers who unknowingly paid extra money for windowless window seats. Consumers deserve better than empty promises and United's word games."

However, in a Monday filing in San Francisco federal court, United argued that it never contractually guaranteed that “window” seats would provide a view, despite labeling them as such on booking screens and boarding passes.

"The word 'window' identifies the position of the seat—i.e., next to the wall of the main body of the aircraft," United said, according to Reuters. "The use of the word 'window' in reference to a particular seat cannot reasonably be interpreted as a promise that the seat will have an exterior window view."

Attorney Carter Greenbaum represents passengers in class-action lawsuits against United and Delta, claiming the airlines charged extra for 'window seats' that were actually next to blank walls
Attorney Carter Greenbaum represents passengers in class-action lawsuits against United and Delta, claiming the airlines charged extra for 'window seats' that were actually next to blank walls (Getty Images)

Chicago-based United said that courts have repeatedly found federal law largely bars passengers from filing lawsuits over airline fees and surcharges, including those for more desirable seats, as they are part of ancillary revenue that helps airlines keep base fares lower.

Greenbaum also represents Delta passengers in a similar lawsuit filed in federal court in Brooklyn, New York.

Plaintiffs say passengers buy window seats for comfort, light, or views, and would have chosen other seats or avoided the extra cost if they knew United and Delta would place them next to blank walls.

Both lawsuits seek millions in damages on behalf of over 1 million passengers per airline.

The Independent has contacted representatives for United and Delta for comment.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in