Football: Court rules to put Kelly in clear

Friday 04 December 1992 19:02 EST

Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Graham Kelly is unlikely to face a charge of bringing the game into disrepute for giving evidence on behalf of the defence at the trial. His decision to do so incensed the Torquay chairman, Mike Bateson, but the FA have been advised that action cannot be taken against someone for answers they give when questioned under oath in court.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Thank you for registering

Football: Court rules to put Kelly in clear

Bookmark popover

Join our commenting forum

Thank you for registering