Donald Trump foreign policy speech: 5 contradictions in the presidential hopeful's plan

The latest headlines from our reporters across the US sent straight to your inbox each weekday

Your briefing on the latest headlines from across the US

Please enter a valid email address

Please enter a valid email address

SIGN UP

I would like to be emailed about offers, events and updates from The Independent. Read our privacy policy

Donald Trump delivered his first major foreign policy address with the panache and certitude that the world has come to expect from the New York business mogul. But after speaking for almost 40 minutes, did anybody come away with a better idea of what, exactly, a Trump administration would mean for geopolitical affairs?

Foreign policy experts were not left feeling too confident about the prospect of Mr Trump’s global vision - despite his promise to restore coherence to US international relations.

Robert “Bud” McFarlane, former national security adviser to President Ronald Reagan who attended the invite-only speech, told Politico that Mr Trump’s plan was “lacking in policy prescriptions” and his “strident rhetoric masked a lack of depth.”

Former secretary of state under the Clinton administration Madeleine Albright told press that she had “never seen such a combination of simplistic slogans, contradictions, and misstatements in one speech,” calling his campaign “reckless and dangerous.”

Indeed, Mr Trump’s controversial speech was rife with contradictions, as he proposed an America that was simultaneously isolationist and interventionist, consistent and unpredictable, and exceptional yet still weak.

On the nation’s enemies, Mr Trump seemed resigned to the idea that some groups’ US antagonism will never change. “We need to be clear-sighted about the groups that will never be anything other than enemies,” he said, referring to defeating terrorist organisations in the Middle East.

Shortly after, he embraced the idea of enemies becoming allies.

“The world must know that we do not go abroad in search of enemies, that we are always happy when old enemies become friends, and when old friends become allies.”

Mr Trump vowed to make the US “a reliable friend and ally again.” He accused President Barack Obama of bowing to enemies and letting down ally nations. “[O]ur friends are beginning to think they can’t depend on us,” he said.

Later, Mr Trump proposed to abandon Nato allies who fail to pay the 28-nation coalition 2 per cent of their GDP. “The countries we are defending must pay for the cost of this defence – and, if not, the US must be prepared to let these countries defend themselves,” Mr Trump said.

Mr Trump sees ISIS as the top threat to the US and the rest of the world. He promised to work “very closely with our allies in the Muslim world” to stop the spread of radical Islamist extremism. Still, this promise only functions on a condition.

“But this has to be a two-way street – they must also be good to us and remember us and all we are doing for them,” he said.

Mr Trump tore into the Obama administration and argued that, by weakening the economy, they have weakened the military. He proposed that when he strengthens the economy he will then rebuild the military.

Yet, according to Mr Trump, the US has also wasted “trillions of dollars over time – on planes, missiles, ships, equipment – building up our military to provide a strong defence for Europe and Asia.”

When it comes to defeating ISIS, Mr Trump argued that the US should adopt a more “unpredictable” strategy.

“We have to be unpredictable, and we have to be unpredictable starting now,” he said. Mr Trump declared ISIS’ “days are numbered,” but he did explain his strategy to maintain the element of surprise.

Near the closing of the speech, he changed his tone.

“The best way to achieve those goals is through a disciplined, deliberate, and consistent foreign policy.”

Mr Trump delivered this speech as the self-declared presumptive Republican nominee, so it may be premature to have a firm idea regarding exactly what the candidate will bring to the White House Situation Room if he wins.

But if the US is to believe that Mr Trump will bring consistent leadership to Washington – and the world – he will have to demonstrate that very consistency in his ideas.