Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Burglar sues homeowner for shooting him during break-in

The civil lawsuit was filed two years later in Indiana

 

Rachael Revesz
New York
Tuesday 19 July 2016 15:23 EDT
Comments
The homeowner was alerted to the burglar by an alarm in his garage
The homeowner was alerted to the burglar by an alarm in his garage (WXIN)

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

A convicted burglar is suing a homeowner who shot him while he was attempting to break in to the house.

During the break-in, the alarm in the garage went off and the homeowner saw a man running away.

He opened fire on the man and was later convicted of criminal recklessness.

The thief, David Bailey, pleaded guilty to burglary.

Two years after the incident, he has filed a lawsuit in Indiana against the homeowner, David McLaughlin.

“My client thinks it’s outrageous and I tend to agree,” said Mr McLaughlin’s attorney Brian Pierce, as reported by WXIN news.

“You don’t ordinarily expect someone to burglarize you and turn around and sue you for damages.”

“I think the claim is absurd. In Indiana, every homeowner has a right to defend their property and that may include using a firearm,” added Mr Pierce.

According to court documents, “As the plaintiff (Bailey) was running down the alley away from defendant's residence, the defendant (McLaughlin) continued to the public right-of-way (and off his property) and continued firing his weapon down the dark alley.”

The document alleges that Mr Bailey was shot three times, and the third round hit him in the back of the arm, “piercing an artery and causing permanent damage".

The plaintiff has alleged that Mr McLaughlin had “no idea what he was firing at”.

Mr Bailey has also claimed he never actually entered Mr McLaughlin’s home and is seeking an unspecified amount of damages.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in