Tory plan to increase pension age to 75 ‘chilling and immoral’
‘It is an outrageous betrayal of people who have worked hard for decades,' says former minister
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Proposals to increase the state pension age to 75 have been branded “chilling and immoral” by former pensions minister Ros Altmann.
Baroness Altmann condemned the idea put forward by Tory think-tank the Centre for Social Justice (CSJ) this week to raise the current pension age of 65 to 70 by 2028 and 75 by 2035.
She said the move would be a betrayal of hard-working people who had planned and saved for their retirements.
In a column in the Daily Mail, she wrote: “Forcing Britons to work until their mid-70s may help to boost the economy by £182 billion a year, but to me the idea is chilling and immoral.
“It is an outrageous betrayal of people who have worked hard, paid their taxes and made their National Insurance contributions for decades in the expectation that they will receive at least a basic income so they can retire, rather than being forced to labour until they drop.”
Baroness Altmann said the proposal gave rise to the “farcical prospect” that 74-year-olds who could not find work would have to apply for unemployment benefits.
She suggested retraining people older than 50 to find jobs should be a greater priority than increasing the pension age.
“More than a million over-50s want to work but can’t find a job because age discrimination is embedded in the labour market,” she wrote.
“Increasing support for these people - with retraining programmes and employer incentives - should be the first priority, before increasing the state pension age.”
The proposal would also likely shorten the life expectancy of those in disadvantaged parts of Britain, she added.
“The better-off, whose employment does not usually entail physical labour, might hope to live well into their 80s with good health,” she said. “But for people burned out by tough manual work, who tend to have poorer housing, diets, access to healthcare and are at greater risk of ill-health and frailty, death comes much sooner.
“This is already a grave injustice in our society. Driving up the pension age even further makes it worse - particularly for those groups who are statistically more likely to die in their late 60s or early 70s, who will suddenly see the finishing line pushed so far into the distance that it becomes meaningless.”
Baroness Altmann, who was pensions minister from 2015-16, said she had rarely seen a proposal “with the potential to do such damage”.
She said: “The flaws in the thinking must be challenged immediately, before there is any chance of the CSJ paper being adopted by politicians who see it as an opportunity to boost the nation’s coffers.”
The pension age is already set to increase to 67 by 2028 and to 68 by 2046 – but the CSJ, co-founded by former Conservative leader and work and pensions secretary Iain Duncan-Smith, wants to see a faster increase.
In its latest report, Ageing Confidently: Supporting an ageing workforce, the think tank said evidence suggested the UK was “not responding to the needs and potential” of an ageing workforce, with hundreds of thousands of people aged 50 to 64 seen as “economically inactive”.
Press Association contributed to this report.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments