Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

George Osborne under fire over 'pasty tax'

 

Elizabeth Barrett
Wednesday 23 May 2012 08:06 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A group of MPs from across the political divide lined up today to urge the Government to rethink its proposals to slap 20% VAT on baked goods.

Chancellor George Osborne came under fire from the bakery industry, small businesses and pasty fans after unveiling proposals for a so-called "pasty tax" in his Budget.

Lib Dem Stephen Gilbert told MPs during a Westminster Hall debate on VAT on hot takeaway food, that the plans were unenforceable, undeliverable and created fresh anomalies.

The MP for St Austell and Newquay said: "The Government's proposals are unenforceable, they're undeliverable by business, they replace one set of anomalies with another, they are likely to be heavily contested and they will do significant damage to the Cornish economy and high streets across our country."

He reiterated industry concerns that the move could place 2,000 jobs at risk and put 300 bakeries under the threat of closure.

Mr Gilbert voiced support for the principle that baked goods were zero rated except where they were kept hot for consumption.

He said: "In short we are seeking to amend the Government's proposals to include the provision for baked goods to be charged VAT, only if they are kept in heated cabinets or in other paraphernalia that has the effect of keeping them hot for sale in the same way that the battered fish and chips would be kept hot for sale in the cabinet in fish and chip shops across the country."

The amendment, he argued, was "clear and consistent, it is enforceable by the revenue, it closes the loopholes exploited by the supermarkets and therefore raises the vast bulk of the revenue that the Treasury is seeking to obtain from this move.

"It creates the level playing field with the fish and chip shops that the Prime Minister rightly demands, it is deliverable and would be publicly welcomed by the baking industry."

Labour's John Mann (Bassetlaw) claimed the proposals were put forward by an "out of touch, anti-English, inept on detail Treasury team and Government" and urged them to "do the decent thing for England, get rid of this nonsense".

His party colleague Simon Danczuk (Rochdale) queried whether the move would affect samosas sold by businesses in his constituency, adding: "I get the impression that the Government just doesn't understand ordinary working people's lives ... I believe there is actually a snobbery with regard to pies, pasties and samosas."

Lib Dem Dan Rogerson (North Cornwall) spoke about the "cultural element" of eating pasties, stating: "There is also in Cornwall a feeling of the Government taxing something which in Cornwall people would eat instead of a sandwich."

Tory Sheryll Murray (South East Cornwall), who said she was a grand-daughter of a Cornish baker, raised concerns over the impact of the move on small businesses. The ambient temperature test was, she feared, a "highly ambiguous" term.

Exchequer Secretary to the Treasury David Gauke said it was a complicated matter, adding the Government was considering suggestions put forward and would respond to the extended consultation as soon as possible.

Current rules, he added, had been made complex and unfair by previous legal decisions and was one the Government sought to change to create a level playing field.

He said: "I have of course been listening to the contributions to this debate and will ensure that they are taken into account in the Chancellor's decisions."

PA

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in